<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hydrogen Nano Bubble Storage Technology Advances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/hydrogen-nano-bubble-storage-technology-advances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/hydrogen-nano-bubble-storage-technology-advances/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/hydrogen-nano-bubble-storage-technology-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-8874</link>
		<dc:creator>George Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/?p=980#comment-8874</guid>
		<description>why hho works:  If you are using ONLY hydrogen THEN you might have to expend 4 units of energy to receive one unit back, but in this example WE ARE ALSO USING GASOLINE!
I am an environmental scientist with extensive medical and scientific knowledge, and I am getting 55.55 MPG on a 1997 Ford Ranger 2.3 L 4 Cyl pickup truck, by fracturing water into it&#039;s basic elements {hydrogen and
oxygen}, using the electrical system of the vehicle for hydrolysis, and burning the resultant explosive gasses by injection into the air intake, at the throttle body. Also employed is a Master Air Flow Sensor Enhancer,
to lean out the gasoline, I also am running a VOLO Performance Chip for the O2 sensors, which changes the ignition timing, {optimizing for the hydrogen enriched atmosphere of the combustion chambers, and giving the piston 100% stroke range by exploding the mixture at the extreme top of the combustion chambers}, takes over the Electronic Control Unit,
{telling it not to compensate with additional fuel}, and does a host of other things, {like when the A/C is turned on, the engine DOES NOT INCREASE RPM, AS PER FACTORY SETTINGS, IT INCREASES MUCH LESS THAN FACTORY}, So, YOU CAN&#039;T TELL ME THAT HHO DOESN&#039;T WORK! You &quot; YOU CAN&#039;T GET MORE OUT THAN YOU PUT IN&quot; people do not realize WHY HHO WORKS! HHO acts as a catalyst, releasing the stored energy in water!

 HHO works due to the catalytic cracking of the larger gasoline molecules into the dynamic combusting single-carbon molecules of methane and methanol,
in the presence of heat, a catalyst, and water vapor. THIS YIELDS A MUCH FASTER BURNING, AND MORE HIGHTLY VOLATILE MIXTURE INSIDE THE COMBUSTION CHAMBER, THE MIXTURE EXPLODES MORE RAPIDLY AND WITH EXPONENTIALLY GREATER FORCE, DRIVING THE PISTONS DOWN HARDER, POWERING THE ENGINE WITH MUCH
GREATER EFFICIENCY! {DON&#039;T FORGET GASOLINE WAS DESIGNED TO EXPLODE} The HHO gas, although burning at a higher temperature... BURNS MUCH MORE QUICKLY THAN GASOLINE. Due to the much shorter time element involved in the burning,
the HHO gas actually BURNS MORE QUICKLY, MORE CLEANLY, AND OVERALL, MUCH COOLER THAN GASOLINE, and so, the engine, overall, will actually run
noticeably cooler! Here&#039;s why...
 
 Imagine the tiny spark given off by a spark plug. Auto makers already know this tiny spark is not really sufficeint to ignite the gasoline/air mixture
effectively. That is why Ford uses TWO SPARK PLUGS FOR EACH CYL IN THE 2.3 L ENGINES! That&#039;s right! Ford uses eight spark plugs in the 4 cyl engine! Re-
member, this tiny spark is what ignites the gasoline. Now, imagine that same gasoline ignited by an explosion of surrounding hydroxy gas. BANG! A tiny
soda cap full, yes a CAP-FULL of this gas will yield an explosion so loud it will make your ears ring, and produce a flash, that at night, may be seen over a mile away! A CUP-full of hydroxy gas may produce a bang so loud that it can actually rupture your eardrums, causing permanent, irreversible, HEARING IMPAIRMENT AND DEAFNESS! This instant ignition of the slower-burning complex hydrocarbons used in gasoline, will cause the complete burning of the
air/gasoline mixture. Gasoline, comprised of complex hydrocarbons, many molecules long, takes forever to burn compared to the simple structure of a single hydrogen atom. COMPARED TO GASOLINE, THE HHO BURNS PRACTICALLY INSTANTLY. POW! This effect speeds up the rate of combustion causing more
total combustion to the process which means more mechanical energy from the engine. Hydroxy gas surrounding the gasoline/air mixture, causes an ex-
ponentially more powerful explosion in the combustion chamber, triggering a stronger piston stroke, which gives an increase in horsepower, a NOTICIBLE increase in overall performance, and EXCEPTIONALLY EXTENDED GASOLINE MPG,
BECAUSE WITH HHO, IT TAKES LESS GASOLINE! I AM TALKING ABOUT A PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT THAT YOU CAN FEEL IN ACCELERATION, AND POWER, MY 4 CYL DRIVES
LIKE A BIG 6! I JUST LOVE TO LEAVE UNSUSPECTING v-8S SITTING AT THE GREEN
LIGHT AND I AM GONE!!

 In small 4 cyl engines, already designed for greater gasoline efficeiency, using HHO, and with the use of a MAP/MAF ENCAHCING DEVICE TO HANDLE THE O2
SENSORS... {Or something like a VOLO PERFORMANCE CHIP FOR HHO}, EXTREME
MILEAGE MAY BE ACHIEVED.
  
  On a personal level, my 1997 Ford truck, using HHO, has 60 ADDITIONAL HORSEPOWER, GETS EXTENDED GAS MILEAGE, HAS 80 PERCENT FEWER EMISSIONS, HAS A CLEANER ENGINE WITH LESS CARBON DEPOSITS, AND... actually runs cooler
WITH HHO, by far, it is noticable on the temp gauge and FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER, THIS OLD TRUCK HAS ICE COLD AIR-CONDITIONING!!! Now, been 3900 miles on HHO, SAVING ALMOST 100 GALLONS OF GASOLINE! AT TODAY&#039;S PRICES, THAT&#039;S $367.00! It paid for it&#039;s self in only 3 months!
 
 Do not listen to the naysayers, they are wrong, and I just proved it!!! HHO DOES IN FACT WORK! PERIOD! I&#039;LL BET THESE NAYSAYERS HAVE NEVER EVEN TRIED!! PHOTOS AVAILABLE OF THE TRUCK, AND HHO INSTALLATION UPON REQUEST! As stated...
55.55 MPG of gasoline with the HHO! The First Law of Thermal Dynamics is being MISAPPLIED TO HHO!! I WANT TO SEE JUST ONE OF YOU NAYSAYER, IT WON&#039;T WORK, CAN&#039;T GET MORE OUT THAN YOU PUT IN, EPA FOLKS, CHALLENGE ME! Please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why hho works:  If you are using ONLY hydrogen THEN you might have to expend 4 units of energy to receive one unit back, but in this example WE ARE ALSO USING GASOLINE!<br />
I am an environmental scientist with extensive medical and scientific knowledge, and I am getting 55.55 MPG on a 1997 Ford Ranger 2.3 L 4 Cyl pickup truck, by fracturing water into it&#8217;s basic elements {hydrogen and<br />
oxygen}, using the electrical system of the vehicle for hydrolysis, and burning the resultant explosive gasses by injection into the air intake, at the throttle body. Also employed is a Master Air Flow Sensor Enhancer,<br />
to lean out the gasoline, I also am running a VOLO Performance Chip for the O2 sensors, which changes the ignition timing, {optimizing for the hydrogen enriched atmosphere of the combustion chambers, and giving the piston 100% stroke range by exploding the mixture at the extreme top of the combustion chambers}, takes over the Electronic Control Unit,<br />
{telling it not to compensate with additional fuel}, and does a host of other things, {like when the A/C is turned on, the engine DOES NOT INCREASE RPM, AS PER FACTORY SETTINGS, IT INCREASES MUCH LESS THAN FACTORY}, So, YOU CAN&#8217;T TELL ME THAT HHO DOESN&#8217;T WORK! You &#8221; YOU CAN&#8217;T GET MORE OUT THAN YOU PUT IN&#8221; people do not realize WHY HHO WORKS! HHO acts as a catalyst, releasing the stored energy in water!</p>
<p> HHO works due to the catalytic cracking of the larger gasoline molecules into the dynamic combusting single-carbon molecules of methane and methanol,<br />
in the presence of heat, a catalyst, and water vapor. THIS YIELDS A MUCH FASTER BURNING, AND MORE HIGHTLY VOLATILE MIXTURE INSIDE THE COMBUSTION CHAMBER, THE MIXTURE EXPLODES MORE RAPIDLY AND WITH EXPONENTIALLY GREATER FORCE, DRIVING THE PISTONS DOWN HARDER, POWERING THE ENGINE WITH MUCH<br />
GREATER EFFICIENCY! {DON&#8217;T FORGET GASOLINE WAS DESIGNED TO EXPLODE} The HHO gas, although burning at a higher temperature&#8230; BURNS MUCH MORE QUICKLY THAN GASOLINE. Due to the much shorter time element involved in the burning,<br />
the HHO gas actually BURNS MORE QUICKLY, MORE CLEANLY, AND OVERALL, MUCH COOLER THAN GASOLINE, and so, the engine, overall, will actually run<br />
noticeably cooler! Here&#8217;s why&#8230;</p>
<p> Imagine the tiny spark given off by a spark plug. Auto makers already know this tiny spark is not really sufficeint to ignite the gasoline/air mixture<br />
effectively. That is why Ford uses TWO SPARK PLUGS FOR EACH CYL IN THE 2.3 L ENGINES! That&#8217;s right! Ford uses eight spark plugs in the 4 cyl engine! Re-<br />
member, this tiny spark is what ignites the gasoline. Now, imagine that same gasoline ignited by an explosion of surrounding hydroxy gas. BANG! A tiny<br />
soda cap full, yes a CAP-FULL of this gas will yield an explosion so loud it will make your ears ring, and produce a flash, that at night, may be seen over a mile away! A CUP-full of hydroxy gas may produce a bang so loud that it can actually rupture your eardrums, causing permanent, irreversible, HEARING IMPAIRMENT AND DEAFNESS! This instant ignition of the slower-burning complex hydrocarbons used in gasoline, will cause the complete burning of the<br />
air/gasoline mixture. Gasoline, comprised of complex hydrocarbons, many molecules long, takes forever to burn compared to the simple structure of a single hydrogen atom. COMPARED TO GASOLINE, THE HHO BURNS PRACTICALLY INSTANTLY. POW! This effect speeds up the rate of combustion causing more<br />
total combustion to the process which means more mechanical energy from the engine. Hydroxy gas surrounding the gasoline/air mixture, causes an ex-<br />
ponentially more powerful explosion in the combustion chamber, triggering a stronger piston stroke, which gives an increase in horsepower, a NOTICIBLE increase in overall performance, and EXCEPTIONALLY EXTENDED GASOLINE MPG,<br />
BECAUSE WITH HHO, IT TAKES LESS GASOLINE! I AM TALKING ABOUT A PERFORMANCE<br />
IMPROVEMENT THAT YOU CAN FEEL IN ACCELERATION, AND POWER, MY 4 CYL DRIVES<br />
LIKE A BIG 6! I JUST LOVE TO LEAVE UNSUSPECTING v-8S SITTING AT THE GREEN<br />
LIGHT AND I AM GONE!!</p>
<p> In small 4 cyl engines, already designed for greater gasoline efficeiency, using HHO, and with the use of a MAP/MAF ENCAHCING DEVICE TO HANDLE THE O2<br />
SENSORS&#8230; {Or something like a VOLO PERFORMANCE CHIP FOR HHO}, EXTREME<br />
MILEAGE MAY BE ACHIEVED.</p>
<p>  On a personal level, my 1997 Ford truck, using HHO, has 60 ADDITIONAL HORSEPOWER, GETS EXTENDED GAS MILEAGE, HAS 80 PERCENT FEWER EMISSIONS, HAS A CLEANER ENGINE WITH LESS CARBON DEPOSITS, AND&#8230; actually runs cooler<br />
WITH HHO, by far, it is noticable on the temp gauge and FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER, THIS OLD TRUCK HAS ICE COLD AIR-CONDITIONING!!! Now, been 3900 miles on HHO, SAVING ALMOST 100 GALLONS OF GASOLINE! AT TODAY&#8217;S PRICES, THAT&#8217;S $367.00! It paid for it&#8217;s self in only 3 months!</p>
<p> Do not listen to the naysayers, they are wrong, and I just proved it!!! HHO DOES IN FACT WORK! PERIOD! I&#8217;LL BET THESE NAYSAYERS HAVE NEVER EVEN TRIED!! PHOTOS AVAILABLE OF THE TRUCK, AND HHO INSTALLATION UPON REQUEST! As stated&#8230;<br />
55.55 MPG of gasoline with the HHO! The First Law of Thermal Dynamics is being MISAPPLIED TO HHO!! I WANT TO SEE JUST ONE OF YOU NAYSAYER, IT WON&#8217;T WORK, CAN&#8217;T GET MORE OUT THAN YOU PUT IN, EPA FOLKS, CHALLENGE ME! Please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuel Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/hydrogen-nano-bubble-storage-technology-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuel Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/?p=980#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>If the hydrogen nano bubble can be effectively stored in a car&#039;s fuel tank, will there be occurring problems regarding the pressure point of the tank. Aside from that is the temperature security of the tanks since hydrogen is a very active element? Aside from that, i think there will definitely be a problem in drawing hydrogen into this form, we might be just transferring the energy from conserving the car&#039;s efficiency, while we are using so much energy in producing this fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the hydrogen nano bubble can be effectively stored in a car&#8217;s fuel tank, will there be occurring problems regarding the pressure point of the tank. Aside from that is the temperature security of the tanks since hydrogen is a very active element? Aside from that, i think there will definitely be a problem in drawing hydrogen into this form, we might be just transferring the energy from conserving the car&#8217;s efficiency, while we are using so much energy in producing this fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/hydrogen-nano-bubble-storage-technology-advances/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/?p=980#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>At what temp does this water freeze?
If it is the same as normal water then this needs to be addressed. 
Are there any problems with drownding the spark plugs?
Also the energy needed to get the hydrogen is still a problem. So far the ruel is 4 units of energy are required to get enough hydrogen to have 1 unit of energy returned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what temp does this water freeze?<br />
If it is the same as normal water then this needs to be addressed.<br />
Are there any problems with drownding the spark plugs?<br />
Also the energy needed to get the hydrogen is still a problem. So far the ruel is 4 units of energy are required to get enough hydrogen to have 1 unit of energy returned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

